The St. Petersburg Times recently
examined the outsourcing of clinical trials to India. With such a large population, the CROs appear to the population as a way to obtain health care, but with the numbers of companies flooding into India to conduct clinical trials, patients' best interests may be forgotten.
One concern brought up in the article is the difference between the patients of the clinical trial in India and the target patients of the drug in the United States.
"First of all the data must be applicable to the U.S., where the population may differ in clinically significant ways," he said. "And the FDA has to have the capacity to go over and inspect the data. If not, you're asking for trouble."Another is the lack of oversight from the Indian government on the process of the clinical trials.
Government regulators on both sides of the globe are supposed to be the final backstop on the safety of clinical trials. But that hasn't happened in India. Despite being stung by controversies involving the testing behind drugs like Vioxx, Avandia and popular antidepressants, the FDA inspects fewer than 1 percent of all drug trials in the United States. Its record overseas is even worse.Read the complete article
here.